Authority · the models explained

Training Philosophies & Zone Models

The people behind the models: Coggan, Friel, Seiler, Maffetone, Daniels and Lydiard. How their zone systems differ and when to use each.

The main training models

Every endurance plan is some mix of easy, threshold and hard work. These are the named ways athletes balance that mix. Pick one to go deeper.

Most training-zone systems trace back to a handful of coaches and scientists. They disagree on the details, number of zones, what anchors them, how hard to go, but agree on the fundamentals: build a large aerobic base, anchor intensity to a measurable threshold, and keep easy days easy. Here's who built each model on this site, and where to use it.

Andrew Coggan, Power zones & FTP

Exercise physiologist; co-author of Training and Racing with a Power Meter.

Anchor cycling training to Functional Threshold Power (FTP) and a seven-zone model expressed as percentages of it.

Coggan's framework made power-based training mainstream. FTP, roughly the power you can hold for an hour, anchors zones from active recovery (≤55% FTP) to neuromuscular power (>150%), with Sweet Spot (88–94%) as a high-efficiency band. It also introduced metrics like Normalized Power, Intensity Factor and Training Stress Score.

Joe Friel, LTHR zones

Endurance coach; author of the Training Bible series.

Set heart-rate zones from lactate-threshold heart rate (LTHR) measured by a 30-minute time-trial field test.

Friel popularized threshold-anchored heart-rate zones for amateurs, with a simple, repeatable field test: the average heart rate of the final 20 minutes of a hard 30-minute solo effort. His sport-specific zone tables for cycling and running are still a default for coaches worldwide.

Stephen Seiler, Polarized / 80/20

Sports scientist who quantified how elite endurance athletes train.

A three-zone intensity-distribution model: about 80% easy, 20% hard, with little time in the middle.

Seiler's research found that across rowing, running, cycling and skiing, elite athletes converge on a polarized distribution split at the two lactate turnpoints. The insight is less about exact zone borders than how much time is spent low versus high intensity.

Philip Maffetone, MAF / aerobic base

Endurance coach and clinician; creator of the 180 Formula.

Build a deep aerobic base by training almost entirely at or below a heart-rate ceiling of 180 minus your age (adjusted).

Maffetone's MAF method is deliberately conservative, prioritizing fat metabolism, health and injury prevention over short-term speed. Progress is tracked with the MAF Test: pace at a fixed aerobic heart rate should improve over weeks. It's influential in ultra-endurance and triathlon.

Jack Daniels, VDOT & pace zones

Legendary running coach and exercise physiologist; author of Daniels' Running Formula.

Derive every training pace from a single fitness number (VDOT) calculated from a recent race result.

Daniels combined VO₂max and running economy into VDOT, then defined five training paces, Easy, Marathon, Threshold, Interval and Repetition, as fractions of it. One race result yields a complete, individualized pace plan. His Daniels–Gilbert equations underpin most modern running-pace calculators.

Arthur Lydiard, Aerobic base & periodization

New Zealand running coach whose methods reshaped distance running.

Build a huge aerobic base first, then layer hill strength and speed in distinct training phases.

Lydiard's periodized approach, months of high-volume aerobic running before sharpening, produced Olympic champions and shaped generations of coaches. His emphasis on aerobic development at controlled effort is a direct ancestor of today's Zone 2 and polarized thinking.

From zones to a plan

Take your endurance training to the next level

Coach Kalle is an AI endurance & strength coach that turns your zones into daily workouts and adapts as you go.

Train with Coach Kalle →