
Friel's Heart-Rate Zones: 5, 7, and Why Every Platform Numbers Them Differently
If you've ever exported your zones from one app and found they don't match another, Joe Friel's heart-rate model is usually why. It's the most widely used heart-rate zone system in endurance sport — and also the most relabelled. Here's what it actually is, why it's sometimes 5 zones and sometimes 7, and how platforms like intervals.icu use Friel's exact numbers under their own names.
What Friel's zones actually are
Friel's zones are anchored to your lactate-threshold heart rate (LTHR) — the heart rate you can hold for roughly an hour of hard, steady effort — not to an age-estimated maximum. That single choice is what sets the model apart: instead of 220 − age (a guess that can be off by ±10–12 bpm), every band is pinned to a marker you measure on yourself.
Because threshold heart rate differs by sport — running LTHR usually sits a few percent above cycling LTHR for the same athlete — Friel publishes separate cycling and running boundaries.
Five zones, or seven?
Both. Friel's model is fundamentally five zones, but he splits the hardest one — Zone 5 — into three sub-zones: 5a, 5b and 5c. So it's most often shown as seven. Zones 1–4 are identical in either view; only the top end changes:
- Z1 Recovery
- Z2 Aerobic / endurance
- Z3 Tempo
- Z4 Threshold (94–99% LTHR cycling, 95–99% running)
- Z5a just above threshold
- Z5b VO₂max / aerobic capacity
- Z5c anaerobic, short and sharp
Plug in your LTHR and toggle between the 5- and 7-zone views right here:
Lactate-threshold HR
165bpm
cycling LTHR
| Zone | Range | What it trains |
|---|---|---|
| Z1 | Active Recovery ≤ 132 bpm | Recovery spins; flushes the legs. RPE 1–2, very easy. |
| Z2 | Endurance 134–147 bpm | Aerobic base and fat metabolism. RPE 3–4, all-day pace. |
| Z3 | Tempo 149–153 bpm | Aerobic endurance, 'sweet' steady work. RPE 5–6, comfortably hard. |
| Z4 | Threshold 155–163 bpm | Lactate threshold; sustainable hard. RPE 7–8, 20–60 min limit. |
| Z5a | VO₂max 165–168 bpm | Maximal aerobic power. RPE 9, 3–8 min efforts. |
| Z5b | Anaerobic Capacity 170–175 bpm | Anaerobic capacity, short and sharp. RPE 9–10, 30s–3min. |
| Z5c | Neuromuscular ≥ 177 bpm | Sprint power and neuromuscular drive. RPE 10, all-out. |
Z1 · Active Recovery. Recovery spins; flushes the legs. RPE 1–2, very easy.
Z2 · Endurance. Aerobic base and fat metabolism. RPE 3–4, all-day pace.
Z3 · Tempo. Aerobic endurance, 'sweet' steady work. RPE 5–6, comfortably hard.
Z4 · Threshold. Lactate threshold; sustainable hard. RPE 7–8, 20–60 min limit.
Z5a · VO₂max. Maximal aerobic power. RPE 9, 3–8 min efforts.
Z5b · Anaerobic Capacity. Anaerobic capacity, short and sharp. RPE 9–10, 30s–3min.
Z5c · Neuromuscular. Sprint power and neuromuscular drive. RPE 10, all-out.
- LTHR-based zones are more individual than %HRmax because they anchor to your actual threshold, not an age estimate. Cycling and running LTHR differ, so test each sport separately.
- Field test: warm up, then ride or run a hard 30-minute solo time trial. Your LTHR is the average heart rate of the final 20 minutes (Friel's protocol).
A PDF with your personalized results, plus a QR code to reopen them anytime.
Why every platform renumbers them
This is where the confusion comes from. The boundaries are Friel's — but the labels aren't standardised.
- intervals.icu uses the same Friel LTHR percentages but numbers the zones sequentially, Z1 to Z7. So Friel's
Z5a,Z5bandZ5cshow up as intervals.icu'sZ5,Z6andZ7. - TrainingPeaks — the platform Friel co-founded — keeps his original
Z5a / Z5b / Z5cnotation.
Same maths, different counting. If your zones "don't match," check whether one tool split Zone 5 into a/b/c and the other counted straight up to 7 — nine times out of ten that's the whole discrepancy. The advantage of Friel's a/b/c labels is that they keep the shared threshold of the top three zones obvious; the advantage of straight numbering is that it's simpler to read at a glance.
What the model gets right
- It's individual. LTHR is your threshold, measured — not a population average scaled by age.
- It's measurable without a lab. A 30-minute time trial gets you a usable number for free.
- It's threshold-pinned. Because the zones hang off threshold, they stay sensible even as an age-based HRmax estimate drifts year to year.
- It's sport-specific. Separate cycling and running anchors stop you from training one sport with the other's zones.
Where it falls short
Heart rate is a brilliant anchor for the aerobic end and a blunt one for the top end:
- HR lags and drifts. Your heart rate rises slowly at the start of an interval and keeps climbing over a long effort (cardiac drift), and it spikes in heat or when you're dehydrated. So the same effort can land in different "zones" on different days.
- It saturates above threshold. In Z5a–Z5c the heart rate differences are tiny and arrive late, so HR is a poor governor for short, hard reps — power (cycling) or pace (running) controls those efforts far better. Friel himself moved toward power for the high zones.
- It's a single-threshold model. It's built around the upper threshold and doesn't explicitly mark the lower aerobic threshold the way dual-threshold and polarized models do — which matters if most of your training is meant to be genuinely easy.
- It's only as good as your test. A stale or badly-paced LTHR test mis-sets every zone at once.
For the why-not-just-use-a-lab question, see lab vs. field testing.
How to find your LTHR
The classic Friel field test:
- Warm up 10–15 minutes easy with a couple of short pickups.
- Time-trial for 30 minutes — solo, flat or on a trainer, hard and evenly paced (don't sprint off the line).
- Press lap at 10 minutes, so your monitor averages the final 20 minutes separately.
- Your LTHR is the average heart rate of those last 20 minutes.
Test rested, and do it separately for cycling and running. Re-test every 4–8 weeks of focused training. Then drop the number into the LTHR zone calculator above, or compare it against your max-heart-rate and %HRmax zones to see how different the two approaches really are.
Bottom line
Friel's model earned its ubiquity by being individual, measurable, and threshold-anchored. Treat it as the aerobic backbone of your heart-rate training — and when you're doing short, sharp work above threshold, trust power or pace over the number on your wrist. And whichever platform you use, remember: if the zones look off, it's almost always just Z5a/b/c versus Z5/6/7.
Further reading: Joe Friel's blog, intervals.icu.